Weather disruption
Winter weather is causing disruption to services in some parts of the county. Find out what services may be affected in your area.
Remove Pelican crossing due to end of life (installed 1984) and lack of use.
A survey undertaken shows use in an urban area is below average. The survey took place on the 4 April 2020 between 07:00 to 19:00.
The pelican crossing was installed, when Weymouth College and Doctors Surgery were close to Holland Road, both are now in different locations in Weymouth.
New upgraded Puffin signals which are only 70m west at the crossroads of Abbotsbury Road/Newstead Road. These were upgraded in June 2018 with added pedestrian crossing.
The advice in Chapter 6 of the Traffic Signs Manual, paragraph 1.9 Consultation and Publicity is:
This is the advice given
Average Delay Per Vehicle (ADPV) survey at the location (4 April 2020):
This surveyed counted, use of the crossing, the number of vehicles and the gap between the vehicles. These three amounts are calculated in a formula, and the final number results show if the crossing is needed or not. In this case it was below average.
Received emails of approval from Dorset Council Councillors, Weymouth Town Council, Dorset Police and Local Housing Association. All agreed to the removal.
Engineers reports on the signal’s maintainable lifespan.
This is what is reported on
Views have been asked for, as part of a pre consultation before it is advertised through a “Notice of intent” to remove a controlled crossing, under Section 23 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.
This is sent to a wider user base plus in the local press and notices on site.
Monitor the responses to the up and coming consultation and then feedback
Impacts on who or what? | Effect | Details |
---|---|---|
Age | Negative |
To cross safely, people would need to walk an extra 80m to alternative crossing or 200m to subway. |
Disability: (including physical, mental, sensory and progressive conditions) |
Negative |
Removal of any crossing point that is currently suitable could have an impact on this group. This EqIA will be reviewed and updated following the pre-consultation to see if any specific impacts have been identified |
Gender Reassignment & Gender Identity:
Race and Ethnicity
Religion or belief: Sexual orientation
Sex
Marriage or civil partnership
Rural isolation
Single parent families
Social & economic deprivation
Armed Forces communities |
Neutral |
We do not anticipate an impact on these groups at this present time. |
Pregnancy and maternity:
Carers |
Unclear |
People who may be pregnant or have young children and carers may have to work further to cross safely to the crossing 80m to the west or the subway 200m to the east. This could impact on some people’s energy and time |
In general it is concluded that there is neutral impact. The action plan identifies an action for age and disability
Positive
the proposal eliminates discrimination, advances equality of opportunity and/or fosters good relations with protected groups
Negative
Protected characteristic group(s) could be disadvantaged or discriminated against
Neutral
No change/ no assessed significant impact of protected characteristic groups
Unclear
Not enough data/evidence has been collected to make an informed decision
Issue | Action to be taken | Person(s) responsible | Date to be completed by |
---|---|---|---|
Age and Disability | EqIA to be reviewed, once notice of intent has passed. | Roger Bell |
Name: Roger Bell
Job Title: Project Engineer Highways
Date: 8 March 2021
The EQIA has been agreed by
Officer completing this EQIA: Roger Bell
Equality Lead: Susan Ward-Rice
Second sign off: Becky Forrester
Date: 8 March 2021