This policy was updated on 4 July 2024.
Removed the references to commercial waste and replaced with business waste.
A joint strategy by the Dorset councils to guide the way that waste will be dealt with over the next 25 years
Dorset councils have worked together to produce this strategy. It will guide the way we deal with our waste over the next 25 years:
This strategy presents a brand new vision for waste management in Dorset. It is the result of local councils working closely together and wide-ranging public consultation.
At 45 per cent (2007/08), Dorset can proudly claim one of the highest recycling rates in the whole country, but more still needs to be done to change the way we approach the whole issue of waste.
Competition for natural resources, pressure to reduce carbon emissions, emerging technology, new national and European polices plus economic pressures, such as landfill tax, mean that waste management needs to have flexibility in a rapidly changing world.
We all need to change our attitude towards waste in order to meet these challenges and that includes local councils, Government, business and retailers as well as householders and even summer visitors.
This strategy includes 10 key policies with an emphasis on:
Local people, organisations and groups all had a chance to have their say about a draft of the strategy during an extensive consultation period.
Roadshows and public meetings plus various events and activities were organised to encourage as many people as possible in the county to get involved.
How we deal with our waste now and in years to come is still a significant challenge. But it also presents an opportunity for us to get the most value from our waste and reduce the impact on future generations.
This is our waste, this is our challenge, and this is our opportunity to shape the future for the better.
Cllr Hilary Cox
Chairman of the Dorset Waste Management Liaison Panel
This document is a revised Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy for Dorset. It has been developed through consultation with householders, businesses, council representatives and other interested organisations.
It updates the previous strategy adopted in 2003 and covers the period 2008 to 2033 and beyond.
Since 2003 Dorset has continued to improve, both in terms of formal performance indicators and also through a wide range of initiatives, to tackle waste growth, increase reuse and encourage community involvement:
The legislation governing waste management is driven by a common framework which applies across the European Union (EU). This is reflected in UK policy and the Government published a new national Waste Strategy for England in May 2007 (WS2007). This summarises the benefits of better waste management as:
In municipal waste terms, a key factor is the EU Landfill Directive. It progressively restricts the amount of untreated waste that can be sent to landfill in member states. It has been transposed into UK law and statutory targets have been set for each waste disposal authority (WDA) to cut down on the amount of waste going to landfill.
The county council is the WDA for Dorset. The system includes a Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme (LATS).
This means that WDAs who send less waste to landfill than their set target can trade surplus allowances with those WDAs who have not or are not likely to meet their target. The scheme also includes fines and other sanctions. Since fines can be up to £150 for every tonne of biodegradable waste landfilled over the target figure, there is a very strong financial, as well as environmental, imperative for Dorset to ensure it meets its landfill diversion obligations.
Currently all of Dorset’s non- recycled and composted waste goes to landfill so complying with the Landfill Directive is a key challenge. This strategy takes into account:
a new revised National Waste Strategy
We are aiming for 9 high level principles based on the national, regional and local policy framework, have been identified to guide the development of this strategy:
The strategic option adopted to manage Dorset’s waste needs to achieve:
A range of scenarios and options that could be adopted to achieve these objectives have been evaluated in terms of whether or not they are realistic and their impacts on the environmental, economic and social wellbeing of Dorset. This work has involved a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Sustainability Appraisal (SA) process. In areas where the formal appraisal process is not directly applicable, it has involved the collective professional judgement of officers from the Dorset councils and their advisors.
Our preferred approach:
The ten policy objectives are designed to support the implementation and achievement of the preferred approach. Action plans have been developed for each one and these documents are updated annually and available separately.
The policy objectives are summarised in the following sections.
To prevent the further growth in municipal waste per head of population by promoting waste reduction and reuse initiatives, with a long term aim towards reducing waste generated per head.
To promote waste awareness through coordinated public education and awareness campaigns, and effective community engagement.
Across Dorset, to achieve 60 per cent recycling and composting by 2015/16.
To achieve an optimised recycling and composting service across Dorset that is easy to understand and use (although local collection arrangements may be different).
To progressively increase the recovery and diversion of biodegradable waste from landfill to meet and eventually exceed the landfill diversion targets under the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme.
To ensure that residual waste treatment complements activities higher up the waste hierarchy and maximises the value recovered from waste in terms of resources and energy.
A full re-evaluation of the potential treatment solutions has been undertaken as part of the strategy review process using the Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) process.
The assessment criteria and the provisional weightings given to them are grouped in the following three categories:
To deliver efficient and cost effective waste management services across Dorset that provide value for money.
Policy objective 8: To further encourage sustainable management of business waste and to optimise integration with the management of municipal waste where this is of benefit.
As local councils to set an example by reducing, reusing, recycling, composting and recovering our own waste and using our buying power to positively encourage sustainable resource use.
To listen to, work with and influence others to achieve sustainable waste management and meet the policy objectives, making use of national, regional and local frameworks.
Waste management is undergoing a period of rapid change and development, and as such, the strategy may need periodic review and refinement.
Whilst the 10 policy objectives should remain valid until the next formal review of the strategy, it will be necessary to keep the respective action plans under continuous review in the light of new developments and changing circumstances.
This is a revised Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy for Dorset.
This strategy has been developed through consultation with householders, businesses, council representatives and other interested organisations.
It updates the previous strategy adopted in 2003 and covers the period 2008–2033 and beyond.
The Dorset Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy 2008:
This is primarily household waste collected from the doorstep, but also includes waste brought to household recycling centres and council bring sites, as well as business waste collected by arrangement with the local council. Municipal waste also includes wastes such as street sweepings, beach cleansing, fly-tipping, and park wastes.
The strategy is structured around 9 high level principles and 10 policy objectives which are based on a combination of:
It takes into account:
The Dorset councils have a responsibility to invest in the right facilities, on the right scale using the right technology. This strategy has an increased emphasis on waste reduction, recycling and sustainability, taking into account the carbon agenda and climate change. It forms a cornerstone for waste policy and planning in Dorset.
This strategy has been developed by the seven Dorset waste authorities. This includes the six district and borough councils and the county council as follows:
Collectively all the above Dorset councils have responsibility for the collection and disposal
of municipal waste in Dorset. The district and borough councils are Waste Collection Authorities (WCA) with responsibility for collection and Dorset County Council is the Waste Disposal Authority (WDA) with responsibility for disposal.
The county council also operates the household recycling centres (HRCs).
Local councils have a legal obligation to produce a strategy for the management of waste collected within the county. In 2003 all the Dorset councils produced the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy for Dorset.
The 2003 strategy identified short and mid-term requirements for waste management, pointing the way for development up to 2020 but also taking into account longer term aspirations to 2033.
The 2003 strategy has been reviewed and updated to reflect changes in economic, social and environmental drivers, as well as policy, legislation and technology in line with Government guidance.
The previous strategy (2003) was reviewed through a process of consultation and feedback in collaboration between all the Dorset councils.
A review was carried out of the current provisions, the policy and legislation, and technology options, and a draft strategy was produced.
The draft strategy together with proposed action plans were published for formal consultation. The consultation feedback was reviewed and taken into account and the new strategy was produced and adopted by the Dorset councils.
The strategy is set out in the form of a high-level strategy document (this document), accompanied by five background reports, a sustainability appraisal, and a set of 10 action plans which correspond to the set of 10 policy objectives.
The strategy is structured around 10 policy objectives which set out our aims and aspirations for waste management in Dorset. These policy objectives are explained in more detail later in this document.
The background reports provide further detail and supporting information for the headline strategy.
For the purpose of the consultation process the action plans were included in the consultation draft. The action plans are now stand-alone documents, separate to the high-level strategy document. The action plans are working documents and form the ‘updatable’ element of the strategy. They will also form the basis of the annual report on the strategy which will be made public and advertised.
Ten action plans stemming from each policy.
The reasons why the review is taking place:
In the context of this document, waste refers to materials legally defined as waste. As a general rule, if a material is no longer required by the original owner, then it is usually legally classified as waste, regardless of whether that material is to be sent for recycling, recovery or disposal, and regardless of whether it poses a risk to human health or the environment or has a value.
Reduction means less waste collected and managed by the local councils. This can include prevention of waste through consumer purchase decisions and recycling of material within the household premises, for example home composting.
For the purpose of local council targets, recycling means the collection, sorting and if necessary baling of materials ready for sale and consignment to a recycling contractor. Recycling includes composting.
This is the waste remaining after reduction, reuse and recycling. Residual waste can undergo treatment by extracting value, either by further materials sorting or energy recovery.
This is the proportion of the waste stream that biodegrades (organic material). According to Government guidance this is, at present, assumed to be 68 per cent for municipal waste. Biodegradable waste includes garden cuttings, paper and food waste.
This term usually refers to recovery of value from mixed residual waste through reuse, recycling, composting or energy recovery.
Pathfinder has a vision to provide a seamless delivery of local services and information built around and influenced by the citizens and communities that use them. Increased efficiency through combined service delivery is a means to deliver that vision.
Since 2003 Dorset has continued to improve both in terms of formal performance indicators and also through a wide range of initiatives to tackle waste growth, increase reuse and develop community involvement.
How much waste are we dealing with and how is it currently managed?
Dorset is a predominantly rural county, with a lower than average population growth and seasonal fluctuations in population due to summer tourism.
In tonnes Composed is the largest material, followed by dry recyclable and finally landfill.
National waste growth has typically followed the trend for economic growth. However, in recent years municipal waste growth in the UK has grown less quickly than the economy, and according to the national Waste Strategy 2007 municipal waste growth nationally has now slowed to just 0.5 per cent. This figure is averaged over the whole of the UK, and
actual growth rates vary from one area to another:
Although there has been a gradual reduction in the rate of growth over recent years, there are many factors that can affect annual growth rates outside the control of the local authorities, such as the national economic climate, migration into Dorset, population growth and weather conditions.
The population of Dorset is estimated to have grown by an average of 0.6 per cent per annum in the five years to 2007/08. Municipal waste arisings per head of population show signs of having stabilised over the last five years; although an increase of around 2.5 per cent occurred in 2006/07 this fell back again in 2007/08.
Notwithstanding the current economic downturn, further growth in both population and number of households is predicted in Dorset in the medium to longer term and this will accelerate if the proposals in the draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) are adopted.
Therefore, despite Dorset’s best endeavours to reduce waste growth, an underlying increase in population will inevitably lead to more waste being produced in Dorset.
The individual recycling rates achieved by the Dorset county, district and borough councils in 2007/08 are in the following tables.
Christchurch rate achieved was below its target whilst all other Councils were above their target.
| Authority | Recycled (tonnes) | Composted (tonnes) | Landfilled (tonnes) | Total collected | Recycling rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christchurch | 3,942 | 759 | 12,764 | 17,465 | 26.92 |
| East Dorset | 7,710 | 4,39 | 20,790 | 32,898 | 36.81 |
| North Dorset | 5,809 | 1,759 | 15,171 | 22,739 | 33.27 |
| Purbeck | 4,229 | 177 | 9,067 | 13,473 | 33.22 |
| West Dorset | 10,801 | 172 | 25,434 | 36,407 | 30.14 |
| Weymouth & Portland | 5,372 | 2,930 | 11,050 | 19,352 | 42.90 |
| Household Recycling Centre | 15,975 | 30,263 | 18,263 | 65,151 | 70.97 |
| Total for Dorset (including HRCs) | 53,838 | 40,458 | 112,539 | 207,485 | 45.45 |
Five of the waste collection authorities (WCAs) have met their recycling targets for 2007/08.
The other important component of recycling is that achieved at the household recycling centres (HRCs) and the performance of Dorset’s HRCs is amongst the highest in the country.
In 2007/08 the overall recycling rate for the county as a whole was 45 per cent. This is an excellent achievement and sets a good base for Dorset to meet its landfill diversion and recovery targets.
WCAs must collect commercial waste (trade waste) on request at a reasonable charge, however business waste producers may choose to make arrangements with a private sector waste contractor.
Business waste is currently collected directly by two WCAs with a small amount collected by a third. Business waste currently makes up less than five per cent of the total municipal waste arisings in Dorset.
One WCA operates a paper and cardboard recycling collection for business premises, with another currently undertaking a feasibility study for a similar scheme. The remaining councils are not planning to introduce business waste collections in the short-term.
On the whole there is limited provision for the recycling of business waste and local businesses rely largely upon disposal contracts with private waste contractors.
However, there is significant recycling potential for waste generated from the commercial sector, particularly from small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). This potential will be explored and addressed in the future.
Dorset currently operates four waste transfer stations to bulk-up household waste for transportation to recycling and disposal facilities.
The Dorset councils currently use two Material Recycling Facilities (MRFs) to separate and bulk the collected dry recyclables. There are four composting facilities used for household garden waste, one of which also accepts household kitchen waste.
45 per cent of household waste is recycled and composted, with the remaining 55 per cent disposed of via four landfill sites
Combined annual cost for waste collection - £9633673.00.
Average collection cost per household - £50.58.
Annual disposal cost - £13038000.
Cost of disposal per household - £68.46.
The legislation governing waste management is driven by a common framework which applies across the European Union (EU).
This is reflected in UK policy and the Government published a new national Waste Strategy for England (WS2007) in May 2007. WS2007 sets waste management in the context of sustainable development, including linkages with consumption and production and energy policy. It summarises the benefits of better waste management as:
In municipal waste terms, a key driver is the EU Landfill Directive which will progressively restrict the amount of untreated waste that can be sent to landfill.
It has been transposed into UK law and statutory diversion targets set for each waste disposal authority (the county council is the WDA for Dorset). The arrangements include the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme (LATS) whereby WDAs who exceed their targets can trade the surplus with those who have not fully complied, together with fines and other sanctions for noncompliance.
Since fines can be up to £150 for every tonne of biodegradable waste landfilled over the target figure, there is a very strong financial, as well as environmental, imperative for Dorset to ensure it meets its landfill diversion obligations.
Currently all of Dorset’s non- recycled and composted waste goes to landfill so complying with the Landfill Directive is a key challenge.
This strategy has taken into account:
The Government has set a challenging framework of recycling, recovery and landfill diversion targets for local authorities.
These targets increase over time, and we need to prepare now to meet these new challenges and maintain our position as a high performing local council.
These challenges create an opportunity for Dorset to improve its waste management performance both now and for future generations.
The waste hierarchy remains at the heart of European waste policy, the National Waste Strategy and Government planning guidance, being part of the revised EU Waste Framework Directive.
It is now widely recognised and sets out a list of priorities for waste management, starting with waste reduction, reuse and recycling, followed by recovery of materials or energy and finally disposal.
The hierarchy forms the backbone of this strategy
The hierarchy is represented as an upside down pyramid shape in 5 sections. From top to bottom in this order:
Waste management makes a significant contribution to mitigating climate change, by both
promoting more prudent use of resources through waste reduction and recycling and recovering as much value from residual waste as possible.
The Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole Renewable Energy Strategy identifies the generation of renewable energy from waste as a priority area and this will be a primary consideration in the identification of the most appropriate form of waste treatment for the county.
The original principles set out in the 2003 strategy continue to provide a robust starting point for waste management. However, our understanding of the issues has moved on, and these original principles have evolved alongside the challenges of modern society and the development of global markets for materials collected for recycling.
The proximity principle is embraced by the need to address climate change and the carbon agenda.
Measures that seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will include transportation considerations, and the minimisation of distances to reduce CO2 emissions will be included as a matter of course in the individual site selection process.
In 1987, the Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as ‘development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’.
This concept has been developed and put into practice over the last 20 years, and it is now recognised that the term sustainable development represents three fundamental dimensions for decision makers - economic, social and environmental.
Sustainability appraisal (SA) refers to the systematic identification and assessment of economic, social and environmental considerations.
It is legally required for major local authority policies and plans.
Councils are responsible for the collection, recycling, recovery and disposal of municipal solid waste, and must meet statutory recycling and landfill diversion targets set by Government.
WS2007 sets out targets and indicators for household waste recycling, household residual waste reduction and municipal waste recovery.
While the targets stated in the National Waste Strategy are currently non-statutory, it is likely that they will become so in the future.
As part of the regime for implementing the Landfill Directive in England, the Government in 2003 introduced the LATS targets for the reduction of biodegradable municipal waste to landfill.
The statutory target years are 2009/10, 2012/13 and 2019/20 and individual landfill allowances have been set for each Waste Disposal Authority.
To reduce biodegradable waste to landfill to:
Note: These dates include a four-year extension granted to the UK by the EU.
Dorset’s allocated landfill allowances for the landfill of biodegradable waste:
In 2007/08 Dorset sent 84,959 tonnes of biodegradable waste to landfill.
The SW Regional Waste Strategy ‘From Rubbish to Resource’ was launched in 2004 by the SW Regional Assembly. The regional aims are to:
Dorset has already met the 2020 regional recycling target, and our 60 per cent 2015/16 recycling target, together with provisions to meet our landfill allowance obligations, will underpin our contribution to meeting the ‘less than 20 per cent regional landfill’ target.
Concern is sometimes raised about the health implications of waste management processes.
To answer these issues, the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) commissioned a comprehensive review of the evidence (‘Review of the Environmental and Health Effects of Waste Management’, May 2004).
The study concluded that on the evidence of studies carried out so far, the treatment of municipal waste is considered to have, at most, a minor effect on health in the UK, particularly when compared with the other health risks associated with ordinary day to day living.
The review concluded that the overall scale of emissions to air from waste management practices is relatively small compared with emissions from other sectors such as transport.
A list of nine high level principles has been identified. These overarching principles are based on the national, regional and local policy framework, and have been adapted specifically for the Dorset waste strategy.
The principles form common themes and provide the underlying basis for the development of the policy objectives set out later in the document.
This is a collective strategy that has been developed and will be implemented in partnership with the stakeholder partners in line with the Pathfinder programme. The strategy is owned and branded by all of the Dorset councils.
This strategy sets the direction for an ongoing process to equip Dorset with sustainable waste management solutions to meet the challenges of the next 25 years, while providing a flexible and adaptable basis for detailed implementation. In this context, it is important that there is a degree of continuity with stakeholder engagement, particularly key decision makers.
The theme of sustainability is embedded into this strategy, and takes into account the ways in which the three economic, social and environmental factors work together, as well as addressing the potential difficulties in achieving a balance between them.
Waste is viewed as a material resource, not a disposal problem.
This strategy follows the hierarchy of priorities for waste management, by first considering waste reduction, followed by reuse and recycling, then materials or energy recovery followed by disposal as a final resort.
As part of the Dorset councils carbon agenda, this strategy considers waste management not as an end in itself, but as an integral part of the whole lifecycle of products and materials.
Sustainable waste management can help conserve natural resources, deliver renewable energy, and reduce CO2 emissions and transportation impacts.
This principle incorporates the proximity principle, whereby waste should, where practicable, be treated and disposed of within the area in which it is generated.
This strategy recognises that behavioural change across all sectors (that is, not only in the home) is key in moving forward but that this is a challenging and long-term process.
The Dorset councils will act as community leaders to promote a further change in the way that we view and manage our waste materials.
In line with the above, the local council partners will demonstrate leadership in their own waste management practices and internal policies in line with the National Waste Strategy 2007.
The Dorset councils will continue to explore possibilities for joint working with other councils for meeting recycling and recovery objectives where this is beneficial and in line with the principles of sustainability.
This policy objective incorporates the principles of regional self-sufficiency, whereby each region should aim to take responsibility for its own waste management where feasible.
The strategic option adopted to manage Dorset’s waste needs, to address the range of issues set out in the previous chapter, can be summarised as follows:
There are a range of scenarios and options that could be adopted to deliver these objectives and the preferred solution(s) need to be realistic in that they can be successfully implemented and achieved as well as having the least impact on the environmental, economic and social wellbeing of Dorset.
A key part of the review process was to identify and evaluate potential strategic waste management options and assess them against a range of factors including achievability and sustainability criteria.
This process involved a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Sustainability Appraisal (SA) process supported, and in areas where the formal appraisal process is not directly applicable, by the collective professional judgement of officers from all the Dorset councils and their advisors.
Full details of the SEA / SA process and the results are set out in the separate Sustainability Appraisal Report.
A range of strategic options were identified based on the variables summarised opposite.
The format was designed to facilitate a ‘mix and match’ solution which would enable the overall solution to optimise each level of the waste hierarchy, taking into account:
Following a comprehensive review, the preferred option is summarised as follows:
Full details of the review and evaluation process are set out in the Options Report and Sustainability Appraisal Report and are summarised in the following sections.
Ten policy objectives have been developed on the basis of the high level principles and the preferred option. The policy objectives are designed to support the implementation and achievement of the preferred option.
The policy objectives are considered one by one in the following sections and these should be read in conjunction with the annual action plans that underpin them.
Policy objective 1: To prevent the further growth in municipal waste per head of population by promoting waste reduction and reuse initiatives, with a long term aim towards reducing waste generated per head.
Policy objective 2: To promote waste awareness through coordinated public education and awareness campaigns, and effective community engagement.
Policy objective 3: Across Dorset, to achieve 60 per cent recycling and composting by 2015/16.
Policy objective 4: To achieve an optimised recycling and composting service across Dorset that is easy to understand and use (although local collection arrangements may be different).
Policy objective 5: To progressively increase the recovery and diversion of biodegradable waste from landfill to meet and eventually exceed the landfill diversion targets under the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme.
Policy objective 6: To ensure that residual waste treatment complements activities higher up the waste hierarchy and maximises the value recovered from waste in terms of resources and energy.
Policy objective 7: To deliver efficient and cost-effective waste management services across Dorset that provide value for money.
Policy objective 8: To further encourage sustainable management of commercial waste and to optimise integration with the management of municipal waste where this is of benefit.
Policy objective 9: As local councils, to set an example by reducing, reusing, recycling, composting and recovering our own waste and using our buying power to positively encourage sustain able resource use.
Policy objective 10: To listen to, work with and influence others to achieve sustainable waste management and meet the policy
objectives, making use of national, regional and local frameworks.
The aim of this policy objective is to reduce overall municipal waste arisings by encouraging waste producers (including householders) to minimise the amount of waste they generate.
This policy objective is primarily concerned with avoiding waste in the first place.
The target is to stabilise municipal waste arisings at an average of not more than 560kg per head of population per annum from 2009/10 onwards calculated as the average over the previous three years).
This figure assumes commercial waste arisings will remain fairly static, however, it is recognised that these may go up as we promote increased recycling to businesses, in line with other strategy targets, and it will be subject to on-going review.
The aspiration is that waste arisings per head of population should begin to fall in the medium to long term.
Total waste arisings are, however, likely to continue to rise for the foreseeable future as a consequence of increasing population. In determining provision of future services and infrastructure appropriate sensitivity analysis embracing the likely range in future waste arisings will be undertaken as part of any business case. In this strategy an indicative overall growth rate of one per cent per annum has been assumed for the purposes of estimating the likely future requirements.
This policy objective will be achieved principally by:
This objective is underpinned by waste education and awareness and public participation in reduction initiatives and there is thus a strong policy link with policy objective 2.
This objective is also supported by policy objective 10 which relates to working with others and, for example, mobilising wider support to influence the primary producers of waste including the producers of packaging.
Municipal waste arisings per head of population have fluctuated in recent years and although they peaked at 575kg per person in 2006/07 they are showing signs of stabilising.
The adopted target of 560kg per head of population is based on the average that has been achieved in the five years to 2007/08. It is recognised that waste arisings will tend to fluctuate year on year and it is therefore proposed that this target is based on the rolling average over the previous three years.
This is considered reasonably ambitious in the light of the peak that occurred in 2006/07 and in recognition that the key drivers underlying waste growth/reduction are related to national and global socio-economic and market factors which are largely beyond the direct influence of the local authorities.
Underlying growth of population of Dorset has averaged 0.6 per cent to the five years to 2007/08 and notwithstanding the current economic downturn is predicted to continue to rise in the medium to long term.
If the proposed draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) is adopted the rate of increase of both the number of homes and population will accelerate over that which has occurred in recent years.
Overall waste arisings are therefore likely to continue to rise for the foreseeable future as a consequence of increasing population and it is important that a realistic allowance is made to accommodate this in planning for future services and infrastructure.
Whilst this will be carefully assessed as part of the detailed business case for any new services or infrastructure it is necessary to adopt a figure for broad planning purposes and one per cent per annum is considered a prudent and realistic figure for this purpose.
This will be kept under review and sensitivity testing will continue to ensure the most accurate predictions as possible are used.
Over recent years, Dorset has engaged in effective education and awareness campaigns and the rate of waste growth is already beginning to fall while recycling and composting levels are increasing.
This policy objective will build on the existing good work of the local councils and look for opportunities to increase awareness and public participation in waste reduction and recycling.
This objective underpins policy objectives 1 and 3 by promoting waste reduction and recycling. It supports the higher levels of the waste hierarchy, providing one of the important elements needed to achieve the policy objectives set out in this strategy.
The high recycling targets achieved so far demonstrate a real enthusiasm for recycling in Dorset.
The commitment of our residents together with effective education and awareness campaigns mean that here in Dorset we have already met our 2015 national recycling targets, and we are well placed to achieve our national 50 per cent recycling target by 2020.
However, with tougher landfill diversion targets, increasing disposal costs and new targets beyond the horizon, Dorset must continue to seek ways to reduce waste and achieve our recycling potential to avoid unnecessary treatment or disposal of residual waste.
Education and awareness will play a fundamental role in meeting and sustaining the objectives set out in this waste strategy, in particular by increasing participation in recycling schemes and local initiatives.
It is envisaged that the target of 60 per cent recycling and composting will be achieved by 2015/16 on the following broad basis:
This objective is underpinned by waste education and awareness and public participation in recycling initiatives. There is thus a strong policy link with policy objective 2.
It also has significant links with policy objectives 4, 5 and 6.
A high proportion of municipal waste can potentially be recycled, however there is an escalating cost associated with extracting materials, and economic viability rapidly decreases as materials become mixed or contaminated with non-recyclable materials.
Separate collection of recyclable materials is therefore key to sustainable recycling and this depends upon public participation - and ultimately our enthusiasm for recycling in the home.
WS2007 recycling target for England is 50% by 2020. Dorset has already achieved 45% recycling in 2007/08 and residents have shown a great commitment to recycling across the county.
Taking into account the recycling potential for municipal waste, collection constraints, participation rates and a range of other factors, we believe that we can achieve more than the statutory minimum.
This also helps us meet our landfill diversion targets.
Whilst the existing recycling and composting arrangements are working well and are delivering levels of performance that are currently considered good on a national basis, there is still potential to build on the success to date.
Various scenarios for extending and enhancing the existing recycling and composting services and increasing the level of participation have been considered and it has been concluded that it is reasonable to work towards a 60% level of recycling and composting by 2015/16 on the basis set out in the policy above.
The 60% target exceeds the national targets for both 2015 (45%) and 2020 (50%). By the principle of diminishing returns, increased rates of recycling and
composting become more difficult to achieve and it is recognised that 60% will be a challenging target to achieve.
However, given progress to date and the demonstrable commitment of Dorset’s residents, it has been concluded that it is a realistic ambition.
The need to optimise recycling and collection services across the county to support delivery of our 60% recycling target is recognised, and this is set out in the following policy objective.
This policy objective will be achieved principally by:
This policy is closely linked with policy objective 3.
There is currently much variation in the arrangements for the collection of recyclables and kitchen waste (for composting) around the county.
Whilst the types of materials collected are often similar there are a large number of practical arrangements currently in operation.
It is recognised that there would be significant benefits in aligning and optimising the collection arrangements in so far as possible.
In particular:
However, there are significant capital and recurring revenue costs associated with changing collection regimes including, in particular, vehicles, collection receptacles and a need to employ additional staff.
Changes can therefore only be introduced gradually and generally only when existing capital infrastructure needs replacement and/or as part of broader changes.
The objective is to meet the LATS targets up to 2020, as a minimum, with an aspiration to exceed the LATS targets in the medium term.
Consideration will be given to working towards zero disposal of biodegradable waste to landfill in the longer term.
This policy objective will be achieved principally by:
This objective is linked with policy objective 3, 4 and 6.
Disposal of biodegradable waste to landfill is not a sustainable option as it results, amongst other things, in the emission of methane to the atmosphere, fails to recover value from the waste stream and potentially consumes land that could be better utilised.
It is for these reasons that the EU Landfill Directive established challenging targets for the diversion of BMW from landfill which has been transposed into LATS in England.
It is also the driver for the rising cost of landfill tax. Under LATS, the statutory target dates for WDAs are 2009/10, 2012/13 and 2019/20. Dorset currently relies on landfill for the disposal of residual waste and must significantly reduce the amount of biodegradable waste it sends to landfill in order to meet its LATS obligations, avoid the risk of fines and also mitigate against the rising cost of landfill.
There are benefits in using anaerobic digestion (AD), a term given to the biological breakdown of organic material in the absence of oxygen, to treat kitchen and other food waste. The AD process allows the capture of methane which can be used to generate electricity or even to run vehicles.
The opportunities to utilise AD to treat kitchen waste will be pursued as it is recognised this contributes to meeting other targets, makes the best use of resources, and produces renewable energy. However, this may not be viable in the short to medium term given the alternative forms of treatment currently available (including composting in an enclosed vessel).
The potential role of AD in Dorset will be explored and developments kept under review, including evaluating any opportunities should they arise.
Sufficient residual waste treatment capacity will be procured to ensure that the following objectives are achieved after taking into account the targeted levels of recycling and composting:
The form of residual waste treatment will be evaluated on the basis of the environmental, social, economic and deliverability criteria set out in the section below.
A provisional assessment using environmental, social and economic criteria to ensure sustainability is fully addressed, indicates that the following forms of treatment perform reasonably well against the agreed criteria;
However, a more rigorous evaluation will be undertaken as part of any future procurement process, taking into account the more detailed information that would then be available.
It is recognised that economies of scale are particularly relevant to the treatment of residual waste and opportunities for both collaboration with other authorities and co-treatment of a proportion of business waste will be explored where they can provide better value for money.
This would also assist with more sustainable management of business waste.
This objective is linked to policy objective 3, 4 and 5. It also has significant cost implications and therefore an important link to policy objective 7.
Residual waste is that waste which is not recycled or composted and in Dorset it is currently disposed of to landfill. Recent progress with recycling and composting and the new target to achieve 60% by 2015/16 will help to significantly reduce the quantity of residual waste arising from the municipal waste stream.
However, there will always be a proportion of residual waste that needs to be dealt with. The current projected tonnages of residual waste arising from the municipal waste stream are detailed below
Based on 1 per cent annual growth in total waste arisings and 60 per cent recycling achieved by 2015/16:
The cost of disposal to landfill is rising significantly as a consequence of the escalation of landfill tax in particular that for non-hazardous waste, which is currently £32/tonne and set to increase to £48/tonne in 2010/11.
The Government have clearly stated that it will increase further thereafter.
In order to meet the county’s LATS targets for the diversion of BMW from landfill it will be necessary to treat at least a proportion of the residual waste, as identified in policy objective 5.
It is currently predicted that it will be necessary to divert a minimum of approximately 40,000 tonnes of residual waste from landfill by 2020 in order to meet the WDAs’ LATS obligations.
Diverting this minimum quantity of waste from landfill would still mean landfilling approximately 58,000 tonnes of municipal waste with consequent emissions of methane and no recovery of value from the waste.
In addition, there are economies of scale involved in developing waste treatment facilities and it may not be cost-effective for Dorset to procure a facility of this marginal size.
When considering the procurement of infrastructure it is necessary to plan for the longer term needs of the next 25 -30 years both in terms of potential continued growth in waste and the availability of landfill.
It is recognised that increasing restrictions, reduced physical availability and rising costs are likely to prohibit the use of landfill for the disposal of municipal waste in the long run.
The possibility of a future ban on all biodegradable waste from landfill (biodegradable hazardous waste has already been banned) is discussed in the national Waste Strategy 2007 (WS2007).
Collaboration between authorities is encouraged by DEFRA in relation to the treatment of residual waste in recognition of the potential to deliver better value for money.
The Dorset councils work in partnership with both the Borough of Poole and Bournemouth Borough Council, in particular, and are seeking opportunities for joint working where this is beneficial.
A more holistic approach embracing both municipal and business waste is also now encouraged and it is estimated that approximately 400,000 tonnes of commercial waste is generated in Dorset (including the Bournemouth and Poole area) each year.
A more integrated approach provides a real opportunity to deliver more cost effective and environmentally sound options for Dorset as a whole, including both the public sector and SMEs in particular.
Therefore, in line with our philosophy and high-level principles to minimise waste to landfill, meet and eventually exceed landfill targets, work in collaboration with others and provide good value for money, any treatment facility for residual waste should be of a scale to:
On the basis of this information it is currently considered prudent to plan for a residual treatment capacity of approximately 150,000 tonnes per year. This capacity is made up of the following:
This capacity has been assumed in the provisional evaluation of residual treatment options which has been undertaken in relation to this strategy.
This is not, however, fixed and will be kept under review. In particular, a more rigorous evaluation will be undertaken before finalising any procurement and this will take into account a full risk assessment, the circumstances at the time and the most optimum solution then available.
In the short term to meet the landfill diversion targets prior to a waste treatment facility being operational, an interim contract has been agreed with New Earth Solutions near Poole to assist with Dorset’s requirements for diversion from landfill up to 2012.
This involves quite small tonnages and a permanent solution is required to meet the longer term needs.
Other interim contracts may also be required depending on waste growth, recycling behaviour and procurement.
The previous strategy (2003) identified a process of Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) leading to the production of a Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) as the preferred form for treatment of residual waste.
However, there have been significant developments in available technologies over the last five years and it has also become clear that allowing greater flexibility for industry to respond innovatively to our needs is likely to deliver more cost effective solutions.
A full re-evaluation of the potential solutions was undertaken as part of the review of the strategy.
The assessment process, involving a Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), is fully described in the Sustainability Appraisal Report.
The approach is based on evaluation of potential options against an agreed list of sustainability criteria and weightings.
The criteria have been developed with reference to European and national laws, the South West Regional Sustainable Development Framework and Dorset’s own sustainable development aspirations.
Natural England, English Heritage and the Environment Agency were consulted about the criteria during the Scoping Stage of the Sustainability Appraisal.
The list of criteria set out in the information below has been adopted following consultation during the Scoping Stage.
Basis of measurement
| Environmental criteria | Basis of measurement |
|---|---|
| Air quality | Emission of potentially acidifying gases to the atmosphere |
| Water quality | Emissions of potentially eutrophic and ecotoxic compounds into freshwater aquatic systems |
| Land take | Estimated land take for waste treatment facilities, measured in hectares |
| Impact on human health | Toxicity levels generated by the waste treatment facility. |
| Nuisance | Levels of noise, odour and litter nuisances caused by waste activities |
| Traffic & transport | Traffic impacts associated with transporting waste and the outputs generated from the facility to their final destination, calculated as tonne miles |
| Climate change impacts | Emission levels of potentially global warming gases to the atmosphere through the operation of the facility |
| Energy recovered/saved | Maximising the total energy recovered and/or saved by processing the waste stream with added value attributed to that amount deemed "renewable". |
| Contribution to recycling and recovery targets |
Tonnage of waste recycled and recovered |
| Minimise biodegradable waste sent to landfill |
Amount of Biodegradable Municipal Waste (BMW) diverted from landfill by recycling, composting and treatment. |
| Minimise residue to landfill |
Tonnage of material waste sent to landfill following recycling/ treatment. Tonnage of hazardous waste tonnes requiring treatment/disposal |
| Dealing with outputs locally |
Relative proportions of outputs from treatment of waste that are used/disposed of within the county (excluding that exported from the county for recycling). |
| Built & historic environment |
Potential impacts on the physical environment in terms of visual impact |
| Social criteria | Basis of measurement |
|---|---|
| Employment | How many jobs will the facility or new collection systems generate? Will they provide stable, long-term employment? |
| Participation levels | Ease of participation and the variation of the service across Dorset. Risk of fly tipping. |
| Economic criteria | Basis of measurement |
|---|---|
| Strive to have best value waste management service |
Cost of delivering the service based on capital, operational and collection costs across the county |
| Reducing risk and commercial & financial robustness |
|
These criteria were initially weighted on the basis of the professional judgement of officers and advisors and subsequently modified following feedback from the consultation.
The criteria are grouped under the three principle sustainability considerations, namely:
These three high level categories have first been weighted by allocating marks out of ten in each case.
These high-level scores have then been allocated across the detailed criteria within a particular category by awarding each criterion a mark out of ten in the same way. The weightings derived from the process are then expressed as a percentage for ease of overall comparison.
These weightings, determined on the above basis, have been used to complete a provisional assessment of the options.
It is proposed that the criteria and weightings used to let the contract for the final choice of residual waste treatment in the future should be based on those contained in this strategy.
However, it is recognised that some amendment may be necessary to select any additional considerations relevant at the time the WDA procures a contract, including for example deliverability, available technologies and funding.
A provisional assessment of currently available technologies has been undertaken as part of the review of the strategy to identify those that perform well against the selected sustainability criteria.
A more rigorous evaluation will be undertaken as part of any procurement process, taking into account the more detailed information that would be available and any additional considerations that are relevant.
There are currently a wide range of technologies and permutations of options becoming available for the treatment of residual waste. Nine generic options have been identified for evaluation as listed below.
These generic options have been drawn up with the intent of embracing all the potentially feasible forms of solutions available.
Scenario 1 - Mechanical separation with Advanced Thermal Treatment
Following mechanical separation to recover further recyclable material the remaining waste is placed in gasification or pyrolysis chambers and heated to high-temperatures in low or zero levels of oxygen.
The process, which is similar to the production of coal gas in the past, generates gases which are collected and combusted to produce heat.
Scenario 2 - Direct EfW
An Energy from Waste (EfW) plant is essentially a furnace that burns waste at a high temperature.
Heat from the combustion process is usually used to generate electricity, and may also be used to supply heat to external users (termed combined heat & power or CHP). The resulting flue gases are subject to rigorous cleaning processes in accordance with the EU Waste Incineration Directive (2000) before emission to the atmosphere.
Direct EfW is therefore very different from the old generation of mass burn incinerators that were mainly used to reduce the volume of waste with no recovery of energy and only minimal environmental control measures.
Scenario 3 - Autoclave (or MHT) with Advanced Thermal Treatment
Autoclave or Mechanical Heat treatment (MHT) is a form of waste treatment that utilises heat, steam and pressure to treat the waste. Following the process high quality and clean plastic, ferrous and non-ferrous metals are then separated out. The remaining cellulose material, or biomass, can be used as feed stock for the gasification/ pyrolysis techniques described above.
Scenario 4 - MBT/MHT with RDF output
Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) involves the mechanical separation of waste into those materials that can be recycled, a fraction comprising paper and plastic fragments which has a high calorific value and can be used as a fuel (Refuse Derived Fuel - RDF) and a fibre fraction.
The RDF material can be used on or off-site for use as a co-generation fuel. A variant on this option is the use of MHT or autoclaving to assist in the initial separation of the waste. In this scenario the resulting fibre fraction from either process is then composted aerobically with the stabilite material being sent to landfill.
This is similar to the preferred option identified in the previous waste strategy, published in 2003.
Scenario 5 - MBT with aerobic composting
Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT), as described above, but without the separation of an RDF and with all the remaining material being composted aerobically and the stabilised material being sent to landfill or, potentially where it is of better quality, being used as a soil improver (in non-food applications).
Scenario 6 - MBT/MHT with AD
Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) or Mechanical Heat treatment (MHT) as described above, followed by anaerobic digestion (AD) of the resulting fibre fraction to generate a biogas for energy production.
The stabilised output is sent to landfill.
Scenario 7 - MBT with AD and RDF output
Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) as described above including the production of RDF followed by anaerobic digestion (AD) of the resulting fibre fraction to generate a biogas for energy production. The stabilised output is sent to landfill.
Scenario 8 - Landfill
All waste is sent un-sorted to a EU specification landfill with energy recovery from landfill gas.
As noted above, various forms of residual waste treatment have the potential to generate energy through some form of combustion.
Energy can therefore be recovered from the waste, and this can make a valuable contribution to mitigate against climate change by displacing the need for other forms of energy generation using fossil fuels.
Depending on the particular choice of residual treatment, if energy is produced, a proportion of this maybe classified as renewable. The Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole Renewable Energy Strategy has identified recovery of renewable energy from waste as a priority area.
DEFRA have recently put an emphasis on authorities utilising Combine Heat and Power (CHP) technologies.
When energy is being generated the most efficient solution is combined heat and power, where the heat is utilised as well as producing electricity.
For each of the scenarios which include combustion to produce electricity the option to also utilise the heat in a combined heat and power (CHP) scheme has also been considered.
In addition to the scenarios identified above, plasma arc gasification is a new method of treatment that combines a first stage gasification, with a second stage high electrical energy/high temperature stage (created by an electrical arc) to treat the waste.
The solid residues are vitrified at the high temperature. It is not yet available on a commercial scale for treatment of residual waste in the UK and there is insufficient data available for it to be have been included in our provisional assessment.
It is not currently considered a viable option but it could be included in future evaluations if it becomes a sufficiently proven option by then.
The evaluation process is described in detail in the Sustainability Appraisal report and the conclusions are summarised as follows.
The provisional evaluation, based on the sustainability criteria and weightings as agreed by officers and modified in light of the outcomes of the public consultation process ranks the options in the following order:
This has been a desktop exercise and ultimately a procurement process would determine the most suitable option.
All the treatment options considered perform significantly better than continuing to landfill
the residual waste.
The options appraisal included a high level comparison of costs. This was based on an estimate of the Net Present Cost (NPC) of each option including the capital cost of building the facility and the cost of operating it over its life (typically 20 – 25 years).
These costs are discounted over time and added together to give a simpler comparison between the options at today's prices.
The results are presented in the table below:
| Ref | Technology | NPC (£) Low is best |
Normalised Score (out of 10, high is best) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mechanical Separation with Advanced Thermal Treatment |
110,000,000 | 10 |
| 2 | Direct EfW | 115,000,000 | 9.6 |
| 3 | Autoclave (or MHT) with Advanced Thermal Treatment |
112,000,000 | 9.9 |
| 4 | MBT/MHT with RDF Output | 147,000,000 | 7.5 |
| 5 | MBT with Aerobic Composting | 176,000,000 | 6.2 |
| 6 | MBT/MHT with AD | 186,000,000 | 5.9 |
| 7 | MBT with AD and RDF Output | 155,000,000 | 7.1 |
| 8 | Landfill | 223,000,000 | 4.9 |
It should be noted that determination of detailed cost estimates is beyond the scope of a strategy and these figures are therefore only indicatory.
Much more detailed cost estimates will be determined as part of the business case for delivering the residual waste treatment solution in due course.
Economies of scale are particularly relevant to the treatment of residual waste. A single plant is thus likely to be the most economic and the options evaluation, based on the full list of criteria, indicates that a single plant serving the whole county generally performs best.
Opportunities for both collaboration with other authorities and co-treatment of a proportion of commercial waste will be explored and, where viable, will be adopted if they can provide better value for money.
The cost of waste management is rising in real terms as a consequence of external legal, environmental and financial drivers.
The delivery of efficient and cost-effective waste management services is a high priority to which all the Dorset councils are collectively committed.
Improved efficiency will be pursued wherever the opportunity exists but in particular through closer partnership working between the councils within the Pathfinder programme.
Value for money and risk will be considered when strategy decisions are taken and benchmarking against ‘do nothing’ costs will be undertaken.
Links to all policies.
This objective underpins the whole of this strategy and without a clear focus on this area the policy objectives may not be fully achieved or indeed, be affordable. In addition to direct economic opportunities, there is scope to pilot and share best practice to improve performance in areas such as waste reduction, awareness and recycling.
Other important opportunities to be considered include joint procurement and working and shared facilities.
The potential benefits include scope to reduce CO2 emissions and save natural resources, reduced vehicle movements and cost savings.
The overall costs associated with waste management will continue to rise due to increases in landfill tax and the infrastructure required to meet the LATS targets.
Improvements in the way that we manage our waste, in order to avoid landfill taxes and LATS fines, need to be planned for over the medium to long term as new infrastructure cannot be provided immediately.
Strategy decisions that are taken will consider both value for money and risk.
The ‘do nothing’ cost of the waste management service will be determined and used as a benchmark for service improvements to be judged against. The ‘do nothing’ costs will include all known costs associated with the current service provision.
An example of this is landfill tax.
In 2007/08, 112,539 tonnes of household waste were landfilled in Dorset, this cost the WDA £32 per tonne in landfill tax alone, equating to £3,601,248.
Landfill tax will rise to £48 in 2010/11, if the ‘do nothing’ scenario was applied and the same number of tonnes were landfilled it would cost the WDA £5,401,872; this is an increase of £1,800,624.
Beyond 2012 it is probable that landfill tax will continue to rise and increases to £65 -£75 per tonne have been suggested.
On top of typical landfill gate fees this means that the cost of disposal could be in the region of £100 per tonne within the lifetime of this strategy.
On top of this, LATS fines of £150 could be payable upon an unknown proportion of landfilled waste.
The Dorset councils will only proceed with a scheme if it is affordable for the long term and has benefits over the ‘do-nothing’ approach.
All parties are firmly committed to delivering the best possible value for money for the Dorset Councils and the Dorset ratepayers as a whole whilst delivering high quality services.
Whilst this strategy is primarily concerned with the management of municipal waste in accordance with the councils' statutory obligations it is recognised that the management of business waste should not be viewed in isolation.
There are significant benefits to be gained from a more holistic approach.
This policy objective will be achieved principally by:
This policy objective is underpinned by education and awareness under policy objective 2 with some potential interface with facility requirements stemming from policy objectives 6 and 7.
The Environment Agency estimate there is approximately 400,000 tonnes of business waste generated in Dorset annually (including the Bournemouth and Poole area).
Local council provisions for household waste are focussed on their statutory obligations.
Facilities for household waste are quite well established, and recycling has been driven by targets and performance indicators. However, commercial waste recycling facilities are yet to become fully established, with a lack of coordination between demand for recycling, commercial drivers and the distribution of provision.
WS2007 sets an aspiration to reduce business and industrial waste to landfill by 20 per cent from 2004 levels by 2010.
Local council provisions for business waste are currently small-scale, and the majority of this sector relies upon private contractors.
There is considerable potential to recycle and recover more of the business waste stream particularly for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) for whom existing options for recycling and recovery can be limited.
While individual businesses have a corporate environmental and social responsibility to address the environmental impacts of their practices, local councils can play an important role in helping these businesses achieve better environmental performance, by using its existing position, well-being powers and influence at a local level.
The local council can potentially help the commercial sector to establish recycling services by providing coordination and support using our existing knowledge, administrative systems and influence.
This is an opportunity that needs to be explored and if feasible taken forward in the action plan.
Business waste often finds its way into the municipal waste stream, either directly or indirectly, for example through fly-tipping. Information, facilities and enforcement are all needed to promote the responsible management of commercial waste and prevent illegal waste activity.
All the Dorset councils recognise their ability to lead by example, in demonstrating more sustainable use of resources, as a consequence of the size of their own operations and their buying power.
There are strong links to policy 2 but this also underpins all the other policy objectives.
Achievement of this strategy requires householders, commerce and industry, and the public sector to think and act differently.
Whilst the Dorset local councils have an important role to inform and educate to achieve behaviour change across all sectors, this work is unlikely to be fully successful unless they can show that they ‘practice what they preach’.
This leadership role is important in demonstrating that the required changes are both possible and affordable (and may lead to cost savings in some cases).
All local council functions and services need to be involved - from parks and gardens to housing and highways.
All the Dorset councils currently have their own individual procurement strategies, the majority of which refer to green/sustainable policy. Some councils have also set themselves ambitious plans to adopt sustainable waste management and procurement practices through the day-to-day operations of all buildings and employees.
A number of the councils and departments are currently working towards accredited Environmental Management Systems (EMS) – a formal programme to identify environmental impacts, identify opportunities for improvement, implement and report on improvements.
The Dorset councils will work through national organisations such as the Local Government Association and waste management professional bodies to try and improve the background conditions that will assist in achieving the policy objectives in this strategy.
This may require action by government, business and/or other statutory agencies.
Increased recycling depends on sustainable markets for recycled materials. This is an opportunity for local economic development and employment as new businesses may be set up to process and use the recyclable materials.
We will seek to influence the Regional Development Agency and businesses in Dorset and beyond to take advantage of such opportunities.
At a local level, we need to embed the culture of sustainable waste management across all sectors – not just householders. This normalisation of good practice, so that the same principles apply at work or at home for example, is essential if we are to achieve our broader goal of a more sustainable future.
We will seek to influence organisations locally, including commerce and industry, to achieve this objective.
This policy objective supports the implementation of the strategy and links to, in particular, to policy objectives 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8.
Waste management cannot be considered in isolation. It is linked to manufacturing and retailing processes, how people live and what they buy as well a multitude of other factors.
For example, to achieve policy objectives such as preventing waste growth and increasing recycling, we need to influence purchasing patterns and try and ensure that sustainable markets are available, and expanded, for recycled materials.
Achieving the above is outside the direct control of the local councils and we need to recognise that the aims of this strategy cannot be achieved by the Dorset local councils working in isolation.
Everyone from individuals to industry and Government have a role to play in creating the background conditions needed for success.
The Dorset councils can play a key role in effecting change by working with and influencing external bodies.
All of the policy objectives are underpinned by the need to collaborate, listen to and influence others.
Dorset will seek opportunities to work with others to implement the policy objectives.
This strategy sets out the strategic direction for municipal waste management in Dorset for the period up to 2033.
Work has commenced on finalising the action plans and these will be published and updated annually. The first set of action plans will be published in April 2009.
In some areas actions are already in hand under current plans.
It is recognised however that waste management is undergoing a period of rapid change and development, and as such, the strategy may need periodic review and refinement.
Whilst the ten policy objectives set out in the preceding chapters should remain valid until the next formal review of the strategy, it will be necessary to keep the respective action plans under continuous review in the light of new developments and changing circumstances.
An important component of the action plans is a requirement to monitor and report on progress.
Some of the monitoring and reporting, such as landfill diversion and recycling performance, is included under the local council’s corporate reporting systems for national and / or local indicators.
The Dorset councils will publish annual action plans and a monitoring report setting out progress on the action plans together with any changes that are needed.
The strategy will be reviewed in the event of any significant changes in circumstances or otherwise at intervals of not more than every five years.
For more information contact:
Waste Management,
Dorset County Council, County Hall,
Dorchester,
DT1 1XJ
This document is an update to the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy for Dorset 2008 to 2033.
It provides a refresher on the following:
The document also provides a framework for future decisions regarding infrastructure, treatment options and transport networks.
The Dorset Waste Partnership (DWP) was formed in April 2011 and brings together all seven councils within the shire county of Dorset.
This includes the waste disposal authority, Dorset County Council, and the six waste collection authorities:
The county council acts as the host authority of the DWP, employing staff and providing support services such as HR, finance, procurement, IT, communications and customer services.
Under a single management team, the DWP has created a unified workforce of more than 350 staff delivering waste, recycling and street-cleansing services on its partners’ behalf – the first waste partnership to deliver services in-house on this scale.
A key element of the partnership is an innovative cost-sharing approach. The partnership is driving down costs through:
The ‘Recycle for Dorset’ service replaced the 12 previous schemes across Dorset with a ‘one size fits all’ approach.
It is a new uniform recycling and residual waste service which aims to service the entire county (excluding Bournemouth and Poole) using the same collection of materials and frequency of collection for all householders.
Even communal properties are offered the scheme in full.
The service was rolled out to 200,000 households (rural and urban) across five tranches over a three-year period.
The tranche areas were not based on district boundaries, they were chosen to provide the most efficient and cost-effective service as possible.
The ‘Recycle for Dorset’ service offers the following collections:
Following the roll-out, improvements in customer satisfaction have been evidenced through residents’ surveys.
For example, in the summer of 2017, the DWP undertook its own survey which drew over 5000 responses from around the county.
This demonstrated a 87.7% satisfaction rate with the waste collection service.
In term of performance, the ‘Recycle for Dorset’ service has had a dramatic impact on the DWP recycling and composting rate.
The overall recycling rate has increased from 45% in 2007/8 to 59.4% in 2016/17. More specifically, following the roll-out of the new service, the overall kerbside recycling rate increased from 29% to 52% and the overall kerbside residual waste collected decreased from 71% to 48%.
According to recent DEFRA figures, when looking at comparable organisations that deliver a countywide waste collection and disposal service, we are now the best performing authority in the country.
The national average for recycling and composting performance in England for 2016/17 was 44.2%.
DWP landfill significantly less waste compared to 2011/12 (has reduced from 36% to 10% of the overall waste arisings), collect more garden waste (has increased from 13% to 20% of the overall waste arisings) and treat more residual waste (has increased from 15% to 30%).
However, whilst the figures over a 5-year period demonstrate an extremely positive result, it is worth noting that over the past 2 years, the DWP is experiencing a plateauing of its kerbside recycling rate and an increase in its waste arisings.
This is similar to the recent national trend in local authority recycling performance.
Composition of materials identified in Dorset’s residual waste stream (after recycling) in 2017
There are a number of factors which effect waste growth and the key ones are housing and population growth, economic growth and legislative changes.
Since 2008, waste growth has been in a period of decline until 2013/14. Since then, it has started to increase and Dorset has experienced an average growth rate of 1.3%.
It is predicted that housing and population will both increase in Dorset over the coming years. Historical data shows that waste growth is linked to economic growth.
Taking these factors into account, it is estimated that waste growth will be between 0.81% - 2.7%. This data was taken from the Draft Waste Local Plan 2015.
For the purposes of planning services and budgets, the DWP are currently assuming a 2% growth rate for waste arisings.
The DWP cost per household for 2017/18 is estimated to be £160 per household, based on assumptions in growth of households of 1,250 new dwellings per year.
This cost includes everything that the DWP does – collection, street cleansing and disposal. It includes all overheads as well as contributions from commercial activity.
The Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP) shows the cost per household is expected to rise to £170 per household by 2021/22.
Since the publication of the waste strategy, two new waste management facilities have been designed, built and are now in operation.
A Household Recycling Centre (HRC) in Swanage opened at the end of 2011 which provides a safe and user-friendly facility for residents and small businesses to recycle their waste.
In 2015, a combined HRC and waste transfer station near Bridport opened, replacing the existing cramped HRC in the town along with delivering a strategic piece of infrastructure allowing the rollout and delivery of improved kerbside services in the area.
The Bridport facility has since received national recognition through a number of awards.
The DWP is currently focused on delivering another piece of integrated infrastructure for central Dorset which will provide much improved facilities for residents, make efficiencies for waste collection and improve resilience for the service.
The DWP has opted to contract directly with service providers to deliver front line Household Recycling Centres (HRCs) and to secure disposal outlets for the waste it generates.
This approach has been a successful one and has seen improvements in performance as well as delivering financial savings.
Since 2008, the DWP has sent greater proportions of its residual waste to either Energy from Waste or Mechanical Biological Treatment facilities. This has meant that the amount of waste directly landfilled has reduced significantly, with less than 20% of local authority collected municipal waste landfilled in 2016/17.
The majority of the disposal contracts held during this period have been extended to 2020/21.
Most recently, the contract to manage the HRCs, waste transfer stations and associated haulage has been re-let for eight years. This new contract will provide the DWP with significant contributions to its savings target and service flexibility for the contract
duration.
The contract started on 28 August 2016 and introduced charges for non-household materials and reduced winter opening hours.
The DWP aimed to save a minimum of £1.3 million cashable savings when it was set up, this has been achieved.
Furthermore, the DWP have achieved substantial savings since it was established.
The key budget savings and efficiencies made by the DWP so far are:
In addition, the DWP have grown the commercial services work from a fledgling set-up at the start of the DWP into services that are expected to generate over £4m of turnover by 2017/18.
The Dorset Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy is intended to be a high level document, which takes into account the European and national waste management legal and policy framework and sets the direction for waste management in Dorset to 2033 and beyond.
National legislation and regulations govern the way in which waste management is organised, carried out and regulated. These provisions have set the framework for all waste management activities in Dorset and have a direct impact on the strategy.
However, since 2008 when the strategy was published, there have been a number of changes or additions to the legislative framework.
Previously the term ‘Municipal Waste’, as used in the UK and in this strategy referred to waste collected by local authorities.
This definition, as described in the Landfill directive, includes both household waste and that from other sources which is similar in nature and composition, which will include a significant proportion of waste generated by businesses and not collected by local authorities.
Two definitions now exist to describe the waste collected and handled by local authorities:
LACMW refers to the previous ‘municipal’ element of the waste collected by local authorities. That is household waste and business waste where collected by the local authority and which is similar in nature and composition as required by the Landfill Directive.
All waste collected by the local authority. This is a slightly broader concept than LACMW as it would include both this and non-municipal fractions such as construction and demolition waste. LACW is the definition that will be used in statistical publications, which previously referred to municipal waste.
In the long term, the vote for Britain to leave the EU will have a big impact on waste management in the UK.
In the short term, little will change as the EU has already made it clear that it expects the UK to remain compliant with EU legislation until its exit.
Upon exit there should not be any immediate impact on relevant legislation as the majority of EU waste law has been transposed into domestic law in the UK.
Changes to domestic law will take time and are likely to be complicated and prolonged.
EU legislation can be credited for driving forward the emphasis on higher levels of recycling and advancing waste management.
Within the UK, there is cross-party political support for recycling, waste reduction and effective waste management and as such it is unlikely that there will be a reduction in recycling targets. However, there is a risk that removal of the threat of legal challenge for failure to meet targets may dampen the impetus to meet targets within clear timeframes.
Additionally, the considerable levels of austerity experienced by local government may result in diversion of resources away from recycling and waste reduction schemes.
In recent years, the emphasis within the EU has shifted to what is referred to as ‘the circular economy’ – the principle of keeping resources in use for as long as possible to reduce their negative impact on the environment and the economy once they become waste.
The EU adopted a new Circular Economy Package in December 2015 to stimulate a move toward this new agenda across Europe. The package includes proposals for new legislation, action plans and funding to support the transition.
The plan includes proposals for Europe to recycle 70% of municipal waste and 80% of packaging waste by 2030. It also bans landfilling of recyclable materials by 2025.
The EU will implement this new legislation in coming years.
The UK waste industry is lobbying Government to deliver a long-term framework of policy and legislation consistent with the circular economy principles, in absence of EU legislation. This would support long-term industry investment in infrastructure and innovation for waste management and recovery. A common view shared by many local authorities in terms of how to deliver a circular economy is to design waste out of production and consumption.
This will take a complete rethink in how products are designed, how consumers are perceived, and how they operate.
In February 2016 the Scottish Government introduced its own national circular economy strategy.
Since the May 2015 General Election, no announcements have been made with regards to
the future direction of waste policy in England.
This is now further compounded by the vote to leave the EU which may result in a deficit of new policy in the short/medium term.
The last major policy document under the coalition government was the Review of Waste Policy in England in 2011, which set out 13 commitments to move towards a ‘zero waste’ economy prioritising the waste hierarchy and reducing the carbon impact of waste.
One key piece of legislation for recycling in the UK is the Waste Framework Directive 2008. This sets a target for the UK to recycle 50% of household waste by 2020 in addition to the requirement for a legally-binding five step waste hierarchy.
The UK is not yet meeting the target with recycling rates reported as 44.9% for 2014/15, 44.1% in 2013/14 and 40.4% in 2010.
The directive also requires that councils provide separate collections of paper, plastics, metal and glass by January 2015.
In England, separate collections of these materials are required where they are technically, environmentally and economically practicable (TEEP).
The DWP has conducted an assessment of its compliance with the Waste Regulations and reported to members in March 2015. The assessment concluded that the current ‘Recycle for Dorset’ scheme is compliant with the Waste Regulations.
It can be demonstrated that separate collection does not meet the ‘practicability test’ on the grounds of economic practicability.
The additional costs and financial risks associated with separate collection represent an excessive cost.
The Landfill Directive sets out targets for the UK to reduce the amount of biodegradable municipal waste sent to landfill, with targets for 2010, 2013 (both met) and 2020 (to reduce the biodegradable waste landfilled to 35% of that produced in 1995).
The landfill allowance trading scheme (LATS) made good progress toward these.
This was abolished in 2013 and it is now widely recognised that landfill tax (£86.10 per tonne from April 2017) has been the biggest incentive for local authorities to divert material from landfill.
Consistency in household recycling In September 2016, the Government funded organisation Waste Resources Action Programme (WRAP), produced a document entitled ‘A framework for greater consistency in household recycling in England’.
The document outlines the opportunities for greater consistency in household recycling, and sets out a framework for taking it forward to 2025.
The document identifies a core set of materials that every household in England should be able to recycle at home. It also recommends three different types of collection systems to offer greater consistency across local authority schemes.
The recommendations are not compulsory and it is too early to see how this will be implemented and what impact it will have on local authority collection schemes.
Dorset Councils are currently consulting on options for forming unitary authorities within Dorset in order to make efficiencies and deliver savings associated with the stringent budget cuts imposed by central government.
Whatever the outcome of the project there are likely to be considerable impacts on the DWP.
Of the seven partner councils that make up the DWP, Dorset County Council (DCC) are facing the biggest challenges in terms of projected funding deficits. For this reason, DCC are acting as ‘lead partner’ in respect of defining the direction of the DWP budget and expectations around funding levels.
The DCC Cabinet paper on the Medium-Term Financial Plan (MTFP) dated 28 September 2016 discusses a balanced budget for the years of 2017/18 and 2018/19 but with a projected budget deficit of around £11m for 2019/20.
The primary cause of the deficit for 2019/20 is the projection for negative Revenue Support Grant (RSG), requiring payment of grant from DCC to central government.
At the time of writing it is not clear how the budget for 2019/20 can be balanced, nor what subsequent financial years might look like.
In the meantime, the DWP will continue to remain under pressure to deliver financial savings for partner councils wherever possible.
The strategic option to manage Dorset’s waste remains largely unchanged. The DWP vision, along with the five critical objectives, summarise the strategic option.
A Dorset wide partnership to provide a quality, efficient and value for money waste service’.
There are 10 policy objectives that were agreed in the 2008 strategy. These have now been revised to take account of the progress made over the last 9 years, changes in legislation and the future vision of waste management. Policy objectives 4 and 9 from the 2008 strategy have been removed and replaced with new objectives, and the remainder of the policy objectives have been amended. There are now nine revised policy objectives and these are detailed below.
Towards zero growth.
Policy objective 1: Preventing the growth of household waste by promoting waste reduction and reuse initiatives, with a long term aspirational aim towards zero net growth for residual waste.
Underpinning awareness and education.
Policy objective 2: Promoting waste awareness through coordinated public education and awareness campaigns, and effective community engagement.
High recycling and optimised services.
Policy objective 3: Achieving 65% recycling and composting by 2025 and ensuring the optimum and full use of the recycling and composting services provided.
Minimise residual waste and maximise recovery of value.
Policy objective 4: Ensuring that residual waste treatment takes into account the waste hierarchy and cost in maximising the value recovered from waste in terms of resources and energy.
Infrastructure.
Policy objective 5: Enhancing and developing a network of local waste facilities that enable the DWP to deliver, store, transport and treat waste efficiently.
Cost efficient service.
Policy objective 6: Delivering efficient and cost effective waste management services across Dorset that provide value for money.
Enforcement and intervention.
Policy objective 7: Adopting a proactive approach to enforcement involving awareness raising and education about environmental crime and the correct use of DWP services. Responding to issues/offences in the most appropriate manner.
Encourage sustainable management of commercial and local authority waste.
Working with others: listen, collaborate and influence.
Policy objective 9: Listen to, work with and influence others to achieve sustainable waste management and meet the policy objectives, making use of national, regional and local frameworks.
The following sections provide more details on each objective.
The need to provide control over the DWPs waste streams, as local third-party facilities come to the end of their lives, is a priority for the entire DWP service.
Being in control of waste volumes via transfer stations with onward haulage protects local front-line collections. Regardless of the onward delivery point, local collections can remain consistent and not be impacted by changes in disposal location (breakdowns, failures, fires, etc)
Existing infrastructure is at capacity and incapable of accommodating waste/population growth and any changes in the current methods of collection.
This strategy review sets out the strategic direction for the DWP up to 2033.
It is an addendum to the full strategy that was produced in 2008.
It recognises that some policy objectives have been achieved and need to be updated and that some are also now irrelevant and needed to be replaced.
Waste management is recognised as a fast-changing area and the strategy will need to be under periodic review and refinement. Actions from this strategy will be achieved and monitored through the production of the DWP Business Plan, which is in turn supported by team action plans.
The Waste Strategy will be reviewed in the event of any significant changes or otherwise again in another 5 years.
This strategy was last reviewed in 2017.
The next expected review date is 2024.
