Weather disruption
Winter weather is causing disruption to services in some parts of the county. Find out what services may be affected in your area.
1. This policy is intended to define the Council’s approach to the management of Council owned trees and to ensure that they are safe and sustainable. The case for trees and the contribution they make to the quality of our environment include:
2. The following statements constitute Dorset Council’s Tree Policy for Council Owned Trees. It provides clear guidance for officers to implement and ensure that the Council meets its duty of care, legal, health and safety obligations and the sustainable management of the Council’s tree stock.
All agents, partners and contractors of Dorset Council will be required to comply with these policies when working with Council owned trees.
Dorset Council will manage its trees to ensure that it meets its legal responsibilities regarding public safety, for example:
Public safety is of paramount importance when making decisions about trees and the Council has in place programmes for the regular inspection and maintenance of its trees (see Appendix A for inspection frequencies).
These inspection frequencies are based upon Industry guidelines but can be varied according to identified local needs and budget.
The Council will take into account the guidance given by the National Tree Safety Group’s ‘Common Sense Risk Management of Trees’ in its work to achieve this.
Consideration will be given on a case by case basis for additional pruning over and above the tree maintenance schedule where serious obstruction of CCTV coverage by trees has occurred. Primarily this will address community and public safety priorities where critical factors apply.
The welfare of trees and the maintenance of our tree stock will be of paramount importance when considering the extent of any additional tree works for CCTV coverage.
The Council will ensure that all Council tree work is carried out in accordance with BS3998:2010 British Standards Recommendations for Tree Work, and BS5837:2012 Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction.
All tree work will be conducted in line with policy and legislation requirements relating to wildlife.
This includes the:
Dorset Council’s Tree Policy will contribute to the Council’s duty to conserve and enhance biodiversity, as required under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 and advocated in the Dorset Council Biodiversity Strategy amended 2010).
Planning applications for development on Council land where trees are affected should be accompanied by a BS5837:2012 (Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction) survey and an Arboricultural Impact Assessment.
They will also be assessed under the Dorset Biodiversity Appraisal Protocol to ensure that all impacts on biodiversity (including those on protected species associated with trees such as bats which are a European Protected Species) and impacts on Ancient/Veteran/Notable trees are avoided, mitigated or compensated and that the mandatory requirement for 10% net gain is achieved.
Relevant local, regional and national planning policy and guidance which relates to trees include the following, and proposed development will be assessed against the following policies:
Dorset Council operates a presumption in favour of retaining trees unless there is a sound arboricultural reason not to do so. Measures such as coppicing, pollarding and canopy reduction will be used to ensure that every effort is made to conserve and enhance biodiversity while safeguarding the public.
This will particularly apply where a tree is Ancient, Veteran or Notable.
Trees will only be felled for sound arboricultural reasons such as:
Where a tree(s) is identified for removal an advanced notice(s) will be placed on the tree to inform the public, except where urgent and emergency works apply. The local councillor(s) will also be informed.
The Council will plant trees within its annual tree planting programme with regard to the ‘right tree for the right site’ and with the aim of achieving age and species diversification of its tree stock.
Species selection will include, but not be exclusively, native species of value to wildlife in line with the Council’s Biodiversity Strategy.
The Council’s policy is to replace and where possible, increase the Council’s tree stock.
To achieve this, the Council will fund the planting of approximately 300 street trees per annum. In addition, we will continuously work to secure additional external funding for tree planting. For every street tree that has to be removed, we will plant two new ones.
Wherever appropriate, the Council will plant trees as part of its Climate Emergency response to help meet its carbon reduction targets.
The following reasons will not constitute grounds for the pruning or removal of trees by the Council. However, if it is possible to improve the situation through general maintenance, this work will be carried out at the appropriate time as part of the cyclical maintenance regime:
As a general principle, the Council will not create new pollards on street trees which have not been previously pollarded.
However, this may be considered as a measure to prolong the life of the tree where the tree has high existing biodiversity or potential biodiversity.
An acceptable reason for pollarding a tree might be where a tree has been linked to subsidence and pollarding it is preferable to it being removed.
Trees which have previously been pollarded will be re-pollarded every five years as appropriate.
Deadwood (standing or stacked alongside) will be retained on site wherever it is safe to do so for the benefit of wildlife.
The Council will seek compensation from any external organisation, or individual responsible, for significant damage to, or removal of any council owned tree(s) to the value as calculated by the nationally recognised Capital Asset Value for Amenity trees (CAVAT) used by the Council.
This document will be revised from time to time in line with changes in the management of the Council’s tree stock, related legislation and industry guidance documents.
Tree Locations | Recommended inspection frequency in years |
---|---|
Highways (urban) | 3 (previously 5) |
Highways (rural) | 3 (previously 10) |
DC schools | 3 (previously 3) |
Libraries | 3 (previously 3) |
Land around Council Buildings e.g. County Hall | 3 (previously 3) |
Cemeteries / Crematorium | 3 (previously ad hoc) |
Outdoor Activity Centres | 3 (previously ad hoc) |
Open Spaces | 3 (previously ad hoc) |
Country Parks | 3 (previously ad hoc) |
County Farms | 3 (previously 12 – 18 months) |
Subsidence claims made against the Council will need to provide the following information:
Street trees are a relatively recent introduction in England. Prior to the 19th century there were relatively few trees that were either planted or allowed to grow within the curtilage of the highway.
For the purposes of The Highways Act 1980, the ‘highway’ was defined not just as the carriageway (the road surface), but the adjacent footway running from the kerb edge all the way to the back edge of the pavement area. It also includes footpaths and public rights of way maintained at public expense.
Trees growing in the highway are usually the responsibility of the local highway authority and are managed and maintained just like any other element of the highway infrastructure that requires maintenance or replacement from time to time: lamp columns, bollards, kerb edging, signage, etc.
The current statutory requirement is for tree branches to be a minimum of 5.2m above the carriageway and 2.3m above footpaths, although where they combine with cycleways 2.5m is more appropriate.
However, unlike other highway infrastructure trees do not remain static, they grow, enlarge over time, both above and below ground.
They shed leaves and branches, and in some situations may fall over presenting a hazard to users of the highway.
This growth and life cycle which may be perfectly benign in a natural setting is problematic when the tree interacts with the built infrastructure around it in a highway setting.
Trees can cause maintenance issues for kerbs, footway paving, carriageway surfaces, adjacent shallowly founded structures (direct damage) and in certain conditions damage building foundations as well, when growing in a shrinkable clay soil (indirect damage).
Despite all these issues, highway trees are a critical element in the overall canopy cover of the urban forest within towns in Britain.
As such, they make a significant contribution in respect of visual amenity and the many aspects of ecosystem services they provide to people living in towns.
Larger landscape scale trees provide the greatest overall benefits. When managing highway trees, this will be done in accordance with the guidelines in the Well-managed Highway Infrastructure guidelines (WMHI).
Unfortunately, it is often the larger trees, which, if not adequately maintained in the highway context, may cause the most issues for the built infrastructure in their immediate vicinity.
However, there are a range of engineering and maintenance solutions that can easily be applied throughout the trees’ life cycle that allow both the tree and the highway to mutually co-exist, each providing the benefits to society that are implicitly valued by residents and businesses in towns; safe, usable highways and a high quality, well managed and maintained urban forest.
Some examples, not exhaustive, are:
Root pruning of non-structural surface roots to accommodate the laying of new paving, tarmac inserts, rubber crumbing surfacing.
Root pruning of non-structural roots to accommodate relaying of kerb edging.
Placing barriers around trees to discourage parking on verges.
Regular pruning of the tree to control its water uptake and limit its root and trunk annual incremental expansion.
All of the above solutions will require the co-ordinated response and guidance of an experienced and qualified Arboriculturalist working closely with an experienced Highway Engineer.
Some, such as the rubber crumb surfacing bring multi-purpose benefits in that larger areas of rubber crumb surfacing can act as a Sustainable Urban Drainage (SUD) element within the footway, by desynchronising flash flooding and providing additional available water to the tree itself.
Where there is potential for direct infrastructure damage as well as indirect foundation damage, the need for regular pruning of highway trees in particular can be difficult to justify to residents and incurs a cost.
However, tree management and maintenance is a long term management activity and many tree managers take the view that when necessary, it is better to retain a large species, large landscape tree and its root system in situ, but maintained at a reduced size.
This is done in the expectation that at some future date due either to; a technical innovation that solves the issue of building subsidence, a change in climatic factors (increased winter rainfall rehydrating the soil sufficiently annually) or a cultural shift that means property owners tolerate minor cracking (as was the case prior to 1971 before mortgage lenders and insurers covered subsidence as an insured risk) the trees could be allowed again, to redevelop their larger canopies quickly if the worst case scenarios for climate change were realised in the 2050’s to 2080’s.
Thereby providing a quick response to the need for increased canopy cover, restoring them at just the moment in time when they will be needed most and without the time lag and challenge of replanting from scratch.
There is a wealth of technical advice and information available across the relevant sectors that provide practical and comparatively low-cost methods of achieving the objective of permitting highly valued trees to exist within a well maintained and modern inclusive highway.
These solutions will require effective communication to Elected Members and Managers, as well as to the public, as to why they are suitable and necessary for achieving good highway tree management practice.
Britt, C. and Johnston, M. (2008) Trees in Towns 2. A new survey of urban trees in England and their condition and management. Research for Amenity Trees No. 9 Department for Communities and Local Government
Doick et al. (2017) Canopy Cover of England’s Towns and Cities: baselining and setting targets to improve human health and well-being. Forestry Research.
Smith, J. C. (2019) Grants and Regulations Operations Note 051. Forestry Commission
This policy is currently under review.