For adults of working age with support needs
The service reviews referenced in the actions for year 1 will require considerable data analysis to ensure that they are evidence based.
For birth to settled adulthood
The strategic review of the current service offer will require such insight in order to inform the development of the service.
For technology-enabled care
Further work is required with our provider and the Digital team to capture data that measures benefits for people with certain conditions being supported to live independently, and avoiding hospital and long-term care admission. A temporary OT post will support data capture from pilots but we will need to look at how we capture reports from AI systems and better co-ordinate a response.
For older people
Understanding care choices made by people as they age is important (either on their own or with the support of services). This will include a more in-depth modelling of housing demand for older people and the choices that people want about housing for older age.
For residential care (for older people)
Improving information management about care provision to better support commissioning decisions will allow us to bring more people into our decision making, including the care market and health partners.
We need more insight into the self-funder market, as well as the placement activities and trends of our healthcare partners. This will all be part of building greater insight into the functioning of the market, including within specific geographies within the county.
For direct payments/individual service funds
Building a good data picture about DPs/ISFs is important, especially greater qualitative insight.
Analysis of the base rates and the costs involved in purchasing/providing care through this method will also be important, to ensure that it remains a viable option for people.
For day opportunities
We have a reasonably clear picture on the kinds of services people want to access and how they want to spend their days. However, we also know that we have further data analysis to undertake to inform our continued discussions. This will be an early priority. In particular, we want to understand more about private day opportunities, and how moves to direct payments will further expand that market.
For community resilience and participation
A dedicated Performance Analyst role will develop evidence base for cost savings and cost avoidance on locality basis, where social work teams gain support from local community and voluntary sector.
There are a number of interactions and access points that could act as a trigger point for council/partners to consider a preventative service. Data helps us better understand currently missed opportunities, including high risk of hospital admission/health inequalities.
For care at home (for older people)
Locality-based analysis is important to inform all of the interventions in these strategies. This will need to be regularly refreshed.
These analyses will also show changes in flow through short-term services, and inform future decisions about reablement/rapid response.
Analysis of handed back cases will also allow for a model to identify providers at risk of failure, to minimise demand for ‘provider of last resort’ intervention.
For carers
Continued work to build the picture of support needs, including with Health and providers.
As part of that, understanding more clearly what data can tell us about the risk to caring arrangements breaking down will be invaluable.